Pievienot darbus Atzīmētie0
Darbs ir veiksmīgi atzīmēts!

Atzīmētie darbi

Skatītie0

Skatītie darbi

Grozs0
Darbs ir sekmīgi pievienots grozam!

Grozs

Reģistrēties

interneta bibliotēka
Atlants.lv bibliotēka
7,49 € Ielikt grozā
Gribi lētāk?
Identifikators:735355
 
Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 14.04.2016.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Augstskolas
Literatūras saraksts: 56 vienības
Atsauces: Nav
SatursAizvērt
Nr. Sadaļas nosaukums  Lpp.
1.  Introduction    3
1.1.  Subject Area    4
1.2.  Internship/Case Company Description    5
1.2.1.  AAA Diamond Rating System    6
1.2.2.  Five Passion Points    7
1.3.  Problem Area    9
1.4.  Problem Statements    11
2.  Theory    12
2.1.  Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM)    12
2.1.1.  Beginning and development    12
2.1.2.  Motivations considering eWOM    16
2.2.  Social Exchange Theory    25
3.  Methodology    27
3.1.  Project Design    27
3.2.  Research Design    29
3.3.  Research Approach    31
3.4.  Methodological Choice    31
3.5.  Research strategy    31
3.6.  Time Horizon    33
3.7.  Methods of Data Collection    33
3.8.  Overall credibility of the research    34
  Reliability    34
  Validity    35
  Generalizability    36
3.9.  Scope and Limitations    37
4.  Data collection    38
4.1.  Primary Data    38
4.2.  Secondary data    43
5.  Empirical Analysis    45
  Year: 2015    45
5.1.  Primary Data    45
5.1.1.  Semi-structured Interviews    45
5.1.2.  Questionnaire    46
5.1.2.  Analysis    49
6.  Discussion    52
7.  Conclusion    57
  Future Perspectives    57
8.  References    59
9.  List of Appendixes    63
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

7. Conclusion
It is not certain whether there is connection between user behavioral types and motivations to write reviews online as I was not able to measure the right variables against one another, thus this question is still unanswered, however, it can be taken for future research.
We did, however, find out how eWOM and Social Exchange theory define the motivations of online review contributors, and we did establish and found through empirical evidence what motivates hotel guests to share their experiences of TripAdvisor. Also, according to Social Exchange theory cost-benefit factor can function as a barrier that can prevent the person to engage in an (review writing) activity despite the motivations and activity level, because if writing a review is too costly and benefits have low value to the person, then he/she will not engage in writing a review. The survey could be repeated in a few samples from different seasons of the year in this way to compare and validate the assumptions.

Future Perspectives
Additional question could be added to the questionnaire in future questionnaires that would help to find out why those respondents, who say that they do not considered writing reviews, do not want to do it? That would imply that the collected data would be of a qualitative kind, and should be coded differently, i.e. by pattern-matching method, for example.
For future perspectives looking focusing on TripAdvisor alone - it is possible to question the reliability and trustworthiness of anonymous content created there. TripAdvisor does not require to confirm the users’ identity to be able to write reviews, thus fake reviews as well as fake profiles on TripAdvisor are rather problematic endeavors revealing a contradictory balance act between transparency and necessary control mechanisms.…

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Darbu komplekts:
IZDEVĪGI pirkt komplektā ietaupīsi −4,48 €
Materiālu komplekts Nr. 1353569
Parādīt vairāk līdzīgos ...

Atlants

Izvēlies autorizēšanās veidu

E-pasts + parole

E-pasts + parole

Norādīta nepareiza e-pasta adrese vai parole!
Ienākt

Aizmirsi paroli?

Draugiem.pase
Facebook

Neesi reģistrējies?

Reģistrējies un saņem bez maksas!

Lai saņemtu bezmaksas darbus no Atlants.lv, ir nepieciešams reģistrēties. Tas ir vienkārši un aizņems vien dažas sekundes.

Ja Tu jau esi reģistrējies, vari vienkārši un varēsi saņemt bezmaksas darbus.

Atcelt Reģistrēties