Pievienot darbus Atzīmētie0
Darbs ir veiksmīgi atzīmēts!

Atzīmētie darbi

Skatītie0

Skatītie darbi

Grozs0
Darbs ir sekmīgi pievienots grozam!

Grozs

Reģistrēties

interneta bibliotēka
Atlants.lv bibliotēka
Akcijas un īpašie piedāvājumi 2 Atvērt
1,99 € Ielikt grozā
Gribi lētāk?
Identifikators:366867
 
Autors:
Vērtējums:
Publicēts: 26.05.2011.
Valoda: Angļu
Līmenis: Augstskolas
Literatūras saraksts: Nav
Atsauces: Ir
Darba fragmentsAizvērt

At last author want put down roots in untreatable ill person. Like usual there are only two versions – life further with pain and wait for death or speed it with euthanasia. This is too difficult and agonizing decision. By one hand – person love own life and hate only illness, by other hand – it is impossible to continue life with bad pain and suffering. Very quick plus will be rest out of all suffering and other problems but there are too much minuses. Most important is belief in treatment resources. In our time medicine evolves very quickly. Probably after some years untreatable illness will turn to waltz. That’s why very important is individual access to every patient. Patient and doctor will be one team with one aim – fins solution and make correct choice.
Author considers that in this situation patient decision is depended of relevant attention and love. If ill person feel only lonely, indifference and antipathy he or she will decide positive about euthanasia. That’s why is very important be with ill relative calm, fond, heedful; manage to cheer up and give love. Love from relatives can treat better than modern drugs.
Some person make dispute – what is more unacceptable passive voluntary euthanasia or active voluntary euthanasia. It is unbelievable that people can argue about thinks like this, about life end like about going to the cinema. Writer is sure about this behavior misuse. Neither of both euthanasia form is not better then other. Incorrectly to use words “better” or “worse” if dispute is about euthanasia.
At the conclusion author want infers than euthanasia not benefit or badness for our society. Unfortunately this process is inescapable because this society minded to all feeble destruction. Simple law of the jungle for ordinary humanity. Writer recognizes that modern societies can not life without euthanasia but she is sure that total euthanasia legalizing is not necessary.

Autora komentārsAtvērt
Darbu komplekts:
IZDEVĪGI pirkt komplektā ietaupīsi −2,48 €
Materiālu komplekts Nr. 1314966
Parādīt vairāk līdzīgos ...

Atlants

Izvēlies autorizēšanās veidu

E-pasts + parole

E-pasts + parole

Norādīta nepareiza e-pasta adrese vai parole!
Ienākt

Aizmirsi paroli?

Draugiem.pase
Facebook

Neesi reģistrējies?

Reģistrējies un saņem bez maksas!

Lai saņemtu bezmaksas darbus no Atlants.lv, ir nepieciešams reģistrēties. Tas ir vienkārši un aizņems vien dažas sekundes.

Ja Tu jau esi reģistrējies, vari vienkārši un varēsi saņemt bezmaksas darbus.

Atcelt Reģistrēties